<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget Manual Check-Ins, Automatic Is The Way Of The Future For LBS Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/forget-manual-check-ins-automatic-is-the-way-of-the-future-for-lbs-7861/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/forget-manual-check-ins-automatic-is-the-way-of-the-future-for-lbs-7861/</link>
	<description>The Pulse Of The Mobile Marketing Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @snroadmap</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/forget-manual-check-ins-automatic-is-the-way-of-the-future-for-lbs-7861/comment-page-1/#comment-224774</link>
		<dc:creator>@snroadmap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/?p=7861#comment-224774</guid>
		<description>Automated checkins will only be useful if the granularity of controls is robust, and this can be iterated; geosocial users represent a drop in the ocean and the mass market will not adopt anytime soon, and they&#039;ll be even less likely to go for automated anything: &quot;jettison your privacy for an icon&quot; will be the response. That said, initiatives that play the niche can get good engagement with current adopters. Like Twitter, most of any geosocial apps&#039; users have accounts but don&#039;t do anything; I&#039;d wager that Twitter portions will hold for geosocial.. i.e. 5-10% of users responsible for 90% of tweets. It&#039;ll be interesting to see what portion of these peeps will go for automated. I bet it&#039;s half at best, and the quality of controls will determine adoption. A good way to get at this answer: survey tweeps and measure how many of them understand Facebook privacy controls; might be a good indicator of their willingness to adopt automated. BTW, explored geosocial adoption by the enterprise here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/geosocial1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/geosocial1&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automated checkins will only be useful if the granularity of controls is robust, and this can be iterated; geosocial users represent a drop in the ocean and the mass market will not adopt anytime soon, and they&#039;ll be even less likely to go for automated anything: &quot;jettison your privacy for an icon&quot; will be the response. That said, initiatives that play the niche can get good engagement with current adopters. Like Twitter, most of any geosocial apps&#039; users have accounts but don&#039;t do anything; I&#039;d wager that Twitter portions will hold for geosocial.. i.e. 5-10% of users responsible for 90% of tweets. It&#039;ll be interesting to see what portion of these peeps will go for automated. I bet it&#039;s half at best, and the quality of controls will determine adoption. A good way to get at this answer: survey tweeps and measure how many of them understand Facebook privacy controls; might be a good indicator of their willingness to adopt automated. BTW, explored geosocial adoption by the enterprise here: <a href="http://bit.ly/geosocial1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/geosocial1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eydie</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/forget-manual-check-ins-automatic-is-the-way-of-the-future-for-lbs-7861/comment-page-1/#comment-224676</link>
		<dc:creator>Eydie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/?p=7861#comment-224676</guid>
		<description>Ah, we all love that Starbucks coffee discount example--even me, back when LBS was still an ideal based on tower triangulation rather than apps... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, we all love that Starbucks coffee discount example&#8211;even me, back when LBS was still an ideal based on tower triangulation rather than apps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

